Back

Listen and read USA nuclear forces Emergency Action Messages, heard on 11175 kHz

60 points2 hoursmissileer.watch
rafram • 1 hour ago

> Mostly static. The net is quiet until it isn't.

> Preformatted is what you can hear: the same shape every time.

> hearing it is all anyone outside the force can do.

> The day has a shape.

I would recommend switching to a newer Claude model.

jpablo • 24 minutes ago

Which newer Claude model doesn’t do that? Fable 5.1 still writes like that for me. I have to fight against it to write proper software labels, or (the horror!) rewrite things manually.

kccqzy • 22 minutes ago

[delayed]

cowlby • 51 minutes ago

Everyone worried about AI detectors and here I am thinking I can spot Claudenglish in a sentence or two.

david-gpu • 23 minutes ago

[flagged]

bragr • 39 minutes ago

>Mostly static. The net is quiet until it isn't.

Having tuned in myself with a SDR, it isn't that quiet. There's pretty steady rate of messages.

none_to_remain • 24 minutes ago

A weird little trivia: for some time period the Skyking test messages used band names and other pop culture references as the content of test messages. Iron Maiden, The Cure, Duran Duran, Rush, Hansen... And of course test messages may be sent erroneously so we end up with the nuclear command channel carrying messages like "DISREGARD 'THE CURE' TRANSMITTED AT 19" (https://eam.watch/view/d4272f25-fd33-47a4-9b37-6c55a8ea3d0e)

LeoPanthera • 1 hour ago

This is a cool idea. I'm actually quite glad that AI generated stuff is still so very obvious. The world will be a darker place when it isn't.

skygazer • 57 minutes ago

My worry is that what we recognize is the unstylized default, but it might be very easy to emulate any particular human easily enough with some examples and a prompt and n-gram/style template biasing token selection, or iterative generation-scoring loops.

rcxdude • 34 minutes ago

Yeah. The big LLMs have fairly idiosyncratic writing styles. Smaller finetuned LLMs can be quite different (and you can also tune them on a particular person's writing). I think some of the confidence in this is because there's plenty of cases which just don't get noticed.

ytxm • 1 hour ago
londons_explore • 2 hours ago

So these messages are presumably encrypted with a one time pad, and some lookup book of what each message of just a few characters means?

And I assume there are also a high bandwidth comms channels, and this is just the backup which is presumably tested each day.

rcxdude • 30 minutes ago

Some of the comms channels are even lower bandwidth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency (Though, apparently the US no longer uses this)

jacquesm • 2 hours ago

I think this is the primary.

High bandwidth comms are likely a lot more fragile than this. At the same time: there will be many different transmission channels, and I would expect this one to be useless immediately if someone really did something nasty.

notadev • 30 minutes ago

Back in my Navy days, we were taught HF is the less susceptible to jamming so is used for critical comms like these in serious situations. My ship performed in one exercise related to a doomsday scenario. We sat all day listening to an HR receiver until we heard these same messages, and we would then record the characters spoken. The message was repeated so we could make sure what we wrote was accurate. We never responded. Instead, we then repeated the same messages on an HF transmitter, presumably as part of some relay.

throwaway89864 • 1 hour ago

You can probably just point Claude or ChatGPT to decrypt it, it would find that there's some silly and obvious cipher is used that survived from the 60ies, with a 56 bit private key. /this is a wild guess, I don't have any special clearance or access/

jacquesm • 1 hour ago

Not a chance. OTP for sure.

netsharc • 1 hour ago

Sheesh, hopefully a governmental department that has the NSA nearby would've been warned about this...

Then again, it is the government...

rvba • 1 hour ago

I also dont know anything but Im sure AI / cloud / blockchain / mongoDB / (insert fad here) will solve it due to synergy and other buzzwords.

jacquesm • 2 hours ago

Nice and soothing for when you're already a bit nervous about what the next 13 minutes might bring.

yread • 2 hours ago

Reading this comment when it was exactly 13 minutes old

markus_zhang • 1 hour ago

It shows 13 mins ago for me.

stackghost • 2 hours ago

Is there something extra scary happening?

Usual news headlines on the sources I frequent.

jacquesm • 2 hours ago

> Is there something extra scary happening?

You might get something out of how frequently there are announcements on this channel. That's the only real info you're going to get out of this unless you're in a very select group.

dist-epoch • 1 hour ago

> Skyking, Skyking, DO NOT ANSWER

This might be the source of the "DO NOT ANSWER" phrase from Three Body Problem.

vorpalhex • 1 hour ago

Some context for those not exposed to this previously.

Messages usually mean nothing. An uptick in activity means.. nothing. We're on the tail end of a major exercise so upticks in chatter are probably related to that.

Anyone who posts anything along the lines of "but there were 5x more messages or a really big message so N is going to happen!" is a crazy person. Ignore them.

It's neat, but it's not prophetic.

paaloeye • 2 hours ago

Founding Listener :)

FrankWilhoit • 2 hours ago

Latency.

qaz_plm • 2 hours ago

“Skyking, Skyking, do not answer…”