I try to not use AI to write text that's meant to be read by other people. I might use AI to understand and research beforehand, but the writing is mine. The most important reason is that writing allows me to check whether I actually understand what I am trying to communicate. Too many times I've started writing something and once the ideas need to be put in writing, I notice that there are concepts that I'm missing or that I don't really understand.
Second is that the LLMs are not going to have original input, they're just going to expand what I say. So at that point I might as well just send the prompt or the assorted collection of ideas and others can expand on their own. Seems more honest and efficient as I'm not just pushing a wall of slop.
If you create a machine for laziness you're going to get lazy people. It's only going to get worse I'm afraid.
Do you guys think we're going to see a de-evolution of human beings due to technology?
Why are LLMs producing this super tense text more often now? Is it because they are being optimized to use fewer tokens?
I figure they are being optimized to write code/functions and not prose so all text is getting more code like.
I am sure this will lead to can you dumb this up prompt which will miss the important details
claude said u cant call its users meat proxies. Now back to watching 'ow my balls!'