Hey HN, I made a Windows process monitor for app developers and advanced end users. I wanted a taskmgr system-level graph view per app. Windows procmon, while capable, has always been tedious to set up (esp. if not used often). That's pretty much the whole idea behind the app--to simplify app-level monitoring, to make it easy. I hope some of you find it useful!
procmon and process explorer from sysinternals are really good. and there is performance counters.
Nice job! I love the clean interface. Is this written in C#?
Thanks, yeah it is C#/.net9 and WinUI3. I started with C#/WPF, but wanted to get it on the Windows Store and couldn't figure out that would work with WPF.
AFAIK you can publish even Win32 apps on Windows Store.
I don't mean to imply it's not possible, but I ran into issues packaging with Desktop Bridge and the web started pushing me toward extreme solutions, so I changed course. If there's a lesson here, it's to package early (and know what you are up against).
I usually lean on Resource Monitor when I need this kind of info, but it's clunky - so this looks useful!
Looks great. Thanks. One thing, maybe make it clear that it's free? I went looking for pricing especially when I saw the support link at the top.
I realize now that the "Support" link is ambiguous. The price/free issue I'll think about how to make that clear, it's a good point. Going to wait for traffic to subside before making updates, but noted. Thanks
So, yeah: I installed this, and was impressed, just because it's an .appx package. I mean, how do you even create those?
Other than that: it did not immediately crypto-lock my laptop and/or ramp up my GPU mining Führercoins, so that was good too.
Other than that: I did not really see any metrics worth of attention, so I uninstalled the app again, which seemed to work fine as well.
Thrilling stuff, I know...
Looks interesting, thanks! Another one I like that hasn't been mentioned elsewhere in this thread is Process Hacker.
Off-topic: Is it possible to tell your InterroBot how many levels (or degrees) of outlinks to follow?
It's not configurable right now, but I have seen the feature in other products. If you want to chat about it off-thread, there's a contact form in the options page. Happy to chat.
This looks pretty cool. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for offering this for free! it looks great-
why are you distributing this as a .msixbundle? Ive never seen that before (perhaps im un-informed though), As I don't have the Microsoft store I was expecting a .exe (and it appears to install a .msixbundle app via powershell ill need to first install the windows app sdk as well - win11). Is this intended? thanks
I'm distributing msix (msixbundle) because it allows me to package a downloadable installer and a windows store upload. You should be able to double click the msixbundle to run the installer, powershell isn't necessary.
MSIX installers feel a bit odd, I think, because they're far less common than either msi or self extracting exe. They also virtualize the app. MSIX apps, for example, can't write to the canonical registry. It's not all upside, but it works well for my projects.
The SDK install is expected (if not already installed). It should hopefully have been automatically downloaded during the install process.
what would be nice is some utility that just halts any useless process
For advanced end users? why would they ditch: https://systeminformer.sourceforge.io/ ?
They wouldn’t
> Native WinUI–fast startup, light operation
Did anyone notice the Windows Calc app became quite slow to startup recently? It takes 2+ seconds to transform from the empty window with a calc icon to the actual calculator UI.
I should get Win7 calc.
Definitely prefer the classic Windows 7 calculator, you can get it here: https://win7games.com/#calc
If by recently you mean roughly since the release of Windows 10 (or was it 8?), then yes. This is a pretty well remarked on item of embarrassment for Windows.
What is the best, GUI, process monitor for Linux?
I really like Resources:
I'll ask you the same as below: "... I have to ask, do people really use Flatpaks for something like a process monitor? It feels like a process monitor should launch almost instantly. Waiting ~3 seconds for a Flatpak sandbox to spin up just to check system stats seems pretty frustrating."
They’re all kind of lacking imo compared to btop.
https://flathub.org/apps/io.missioncenter.MissionCenter is a good option though
btop is cool, cheers!
But I have to ask, do people really use Flatpaks for something like a process monitor? It feels like a process monitor should launch almost instantly. Waiting ~3 seconds for a Flatpak sandbox to spin up just to check system stats seems pretty frustrating.
Been a happy htop user for a long time but had never heard of btop, will definitely be switching :)
Thank you!
As an alternative, I use the free community-edition netdata -- love it at my job, and it works right out of the box on my personal windows and linux machines.
https://www.netdata.cloud/pricing/
(don't let the `.cloud` scare you off, they have a 100% free and functional local-only install)
It's insanely powerful and with some configuration can persist the metrics in a local database.